Supreme Court’s patience over sustained non-compliance of the Lodha panel reforms by BCCI ran out today with Chief Justice T S Thakur led bench warned to initiate contempt proceedings against its President Anurag Thakur for continued stonewalling of the reforms and open defiance of the apex court directions. On a day when it dismissed BCCI’s curative petition against order to implement the Lodha panel reforms, the court also said it planned to “proceed to prosecute him” (Anurag Thakur) for perjury for making false statements before the court on oath and warned that “once it pronounces its order, the BCCI chief will have nowhere to go except jail”. “This is frustrating. These were well meaning recommendations three judges of this court took pains involved all stake holders and you are trying to obstruct the reforms”, the bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur also said that it has almost made up its mind to remove the present office bearers of the Board and replace them with a panel of administrators. The judges have asked both Lodha panel and BCCI to suggest names of administrators and said it will soon pronounce an order on the action it will take against Anurag Thakur and the board’s top brass for continued defiance of its direction to implement the Lodha panel reforms aimed at sweeping changes in the function, structure and administration of the cash-rich board. The bench is furious that Anurag Thakur went to the extent of attempting to take ICC’s help to wriggle out of Lodha reforms. When there was ample proof of it on record, he had in an affidavit filed on oath denied the same before the court which the bench said amounted to perjury. The bench found that Anurag had asked Shashank Manohar, the Chairman of the ICC to write a letter to the BCCI that the appointment of a CAG would tantamount to government interference in the working of the BCCI. It is to be noted that while objecting to the Lodha panel’s recommendation to include a CAG nominee within the BCCI to bring in “transparency and oversight in monitoring the finances”, the Board had been consistently taking the ground that inclusion of a CAG nominee would bring in an element of government interference in board affairs, which under ICC rules was a ground for its de-recognition or suspension. Interestingly, Manohar in an affidavit admitted that Anurag had written a letter to him in this regard but he had refused saying that the Supreme Court had already taken a stand on appointment of CAG. “We prima facie feel that you (Anurag Thakur) are in contempt and we also prima facie feel that you are liable for perjury and we are inclined to launch prosecution. Manohar is very clear. You did ask him to write a letter from ICC that CAG nominee in BCCI would affect the autonomy of the board and then you denied it in an affidavit filed before the court. This means you have made a false statement on oath. Once we pronounce the order, your client may have nowhere to go except to jail”: CJI Thakur told Anurag Thakur’s lawyer Kapil Sibal Lodha panel had told the court: “Supersede the present office-bearers of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) with immediate effect and appoint in their place a panel of administrators headed by former Home Secretary G K Pillai to ensure the smooth transition from the old to the new system recommended by the committee” The key issues over which the Lodha committee and the BCCI are at loggerheads are one vote per state, one person-one post, age cap for office-bearers, and the cooling-off period for them before re-appointment to any key post and appointment of a CAG During the hearing, Sibal said whatever the apex court was doing was for the betterment of the game but the bench should also allow the board to express themselves. “What the Supreme Court is saying is law and is binding but I may still disagree. That liberty I must have, he said. To this, the bench shot back, The issue is that whether you (BCCI) are absolutely incapable of implementing the recommendations of the Lodha panel which we have accepted. If a person is to be prosecuted for contempt or perjury, how can he continue? If a person is obstructing implementation of the order, how can he continue? Sibal, however, said, I can place the entire records before the court. I am willing to apologise if the court feel that I am misleading the court. No one can dare to do this with the Supreme Court. On the issue of appointment of observer in BCCI, he said it would not lead to any constructive steps. However, the bench asked Sibal, Do you want to give some names for the panel of observers. Initially, Sibal showed his reluctance but later he said he would take instructions and file a list of names. The bench then asked him to file the list within a week and said it would pass orders on whether to initiate contempt and perjury proceedings against Thakur. At the outset, senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, who is assisting the court as amicus curiae, told the bench that affidavits filed by Thakur and BCCI Secretary Ajay Shirke clearly showed that the BCCI cannot implement the judgement of the court.
Important Links
Legal News View
-
SC Reserves Order On Whether The Ismail Faruqui Judgment Requires Re-consideration By A Larger Bench
July 21, 2018
-
July 21, 2018
-
SC collegium recommends Justice Bose’s name for appointment as Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court
July 21, 2018
-
PIL On Military Land Grab: SC Notice To Centre, Army…
February 22, 2017
-
February 22, 2017
-
SC To Hear Letter Petition By Ex-Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul’s Wife Tomorrow
February 22, 2017
-
February 22, 2017
-
Post-Acquisition Allottee Has No Locus To Contest Claim For Enhancement Of Compensation: SC
February 22, 2017
-
SC Tells States To Take Steps To Fill Jail Officers’ Vacancies By Mar. 31
February 22, 2017
-
Aadhaar Bill: Courts Cannot Question Legislative Procedure: AG To SC
February 15, 2017
-
Can’t Allow Pvt FM Stations To Air News: Centre To SC
February 15, 2017
-
Surrender Immediately: SC to Sasikala
February 15, 2017
-
Why Are Pvt FM Stations Refused Permission To Air News? SC Asks Centre
February 15, 2017
-
SC Dismisses Centre’s Last-ditch Attempt To Reverse 2014 Judgment On Commutation Of Death Sentence
February 15, 2017
-
SC To Frame Issues On Triple Talaq; Will Not Touch UCC
February 15, 2017
-
SC To Consider Installation Of CCTV Cameras In Courts
February 09, 2017
-
SC Dismisses TN Government & Rajiv Killers’ Review Plea In Remission Of Sentences Case
February 09, 2017
-
SC Orders Rs 60 Lakh Compensation To Narmada Project Oustees
February 09, 2017
-
Sikh bodies Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC),
February 09, 2017
-
SC Grants Bail To Chit Fund Accused With Condition To Pay Rs One Crore
February 09, 2017
-
Breaking: Appointment Of Principal In Minority Institution Open To Judicial Review: SC
February 01, 2017
-
Jallikattu: SC Refuses To stay New TN Ordinance, Slams Govt. For Violation Of SC Judgment
February 01, 2017
-
February 01, 2017
-
SC Denies Bail To Asaram, Directs Registration Of FIR For Fake RTI Reply, Imposes Costs.
February 01, 2017
-
Ensure 100 % Verification Of Cell Phone Subscribers: SC
January 23, 2017
-
Lodha Reforms For All Sports Bodies: SC Seeks Centre, SAI, IOC’s Replies
January 23, 2017
-
SC Dismisses PIL Against Advancement Of Union Budget
January 23, 2017
-
SC Rejects Plea Of Med Student Who Got Admission Without Clearing NEET
January 23, 2017
-
January 23, 2017
-
SC Wants A Cell To Deal With Complaints Against TV, Radio Shows
January 15, 2017
-
January 15, 2017
-
SC Refuses To Extend Roy’s Deadline; Warns To Jail Him Again
January 15, 2017
-
Praising CJI Khehar, Law Minister Sees A Great Working Relationship
January 15, 2017
-
SC To CBI: Complete Air India Aircraft Purchase Probe By June
January 07, 2017
-
SC Drops Contempt Proceedings Against Katju After Accepting His Apology
January 07, 2017
-
Result Of Case Can’t Be Announced Without Judgment Available On Record: SC
January 07, 2017
-
Breaking: HC Can’t Restrain Police From Arresting Accused, While Declining To Quash Case: SC
January 07, 2017
-
No Illegality In HC, On Its Administrative Side, Transferring A Case: SC
January 07, 2017
-
January 07, 2017
-
SC Forfeits Rs.86 Lakh From Petitioner For Violation Of Undertaking
December 30, 2016
-
SC Upholds Conviction Of Four For Elderly Couple’s Murder On X’mas Eve 25 Yrs Ago
December 30, 2016
-
December 30, 2016
-
SC Once Again Junks Plea Against Khehar’s Elevation As CJI
December 30, 2016
-
Best Of 2016: Significant Legislations Of 2016
December 30, 2016
-
PM Announces New Schemes: Read The Highlights
December 30, 2016
-
December 21, 2016
-
SC Allows Christmas And New Year Celebrations At Shivaji Park
December 21, 2016
-
SC Supports Permanent Commission Of Woman Pilot.
December 21, 2016
-
Muslim IAF Personnel Can’t Grow Beard: SC
December 14, 2016
-
SC Hints Contempt, Perjury Proceedings Against BCCI Chief Anurag Thakur
December 14, 2016
-
Slideshow
Video Gallery
Contact Us
Jharkhand High Court.
Doranda,Ranchi
Call Us :
President:94317-06668
Secretary General:9431106240
Mail Us :
president@barassociationjhcranchi.com
gs@barassociationjhcranchi.com
enquiry@barassociationjhcranchi.com